Blog

Settings and Techniques for Shooting in Available Light with Fast Prime Lenses

Street Gaming. D810 with 50mm f/1.4G fast aperture prime lens. Settings: 1/60, ISO 3200, f/1.4.

Introduction

I have an affinity with night and low light photography going back at least a decade and longer. In this article I want to discuss capturing portraits in low light - either candid or more posed type images and then we can briefly contrast that with how to approach posed setups with a view to professionally light a subject with speedlights or strobes. The rules are the same for both. If we have a flash we can create light anywhere. There are some basic techniques to get the best fidelity out of a flash and I will discuss that here. If we don’t have a flash, we can look for the best light in a scene and either position our subject in that area, or wait until they physically occupy that space. The forerunning picture in this article is of my son who, of one evening got out of the car still playing his Nintendo Switch console. It is shot entirely in available light. I started to unpack the car and as I turned round, he perched himself onto the wall as we see here. Never being one to miss a beautiful moment, I grabbed my D810 which I had in the car (I nearly always have a camera with me wherever a go). I had my 50mm f/1.4G attached. All I did was line up the background and subject, position myself at the correct height (very important) and the rest is history as they say. He is holding a package that his transformer toy came in, that from memory he opened in the car. I could have motioned him to move that or take it away from him; but then it wouldn’t have been a real moment. I would have interfered with something that looks great without my spin on it. It’s much the same way I shoot weddings. I see so many photographers directing the bride and groom, like they are on some Hollywood film set. Their day becomes about parading about doing the same old cliche shots, and ends up being a vision the photographer had of the day, rather than what actually naturally occured. In my mind, true reportage / candid photography should be respected and left as such, and it’s an ethos I hold dearly in my shooting technique.

Girl in Field - Nikon D800 with 135 f/2DC Prime Lens. Fast Primes produce a very unique look, whether it be low light or outdoor daylight shooting.

Shot Discipline

Shot Discipline is absolutely crucial to understand in order to master this craft and type of shooting. Shot discipline is about ensuring our settings make logical sense, and thus are gathering the most light, the best colour, the lowest noise and the highest quality overall rendering of our subject and scene in the process. Before you go any further, it is best you understand this on a deeper level. Read the full article on this here. Consider and remember that shooting in available light does not necessarily just mean low light, however. It just sets the boundary that no additional light is used. For available light shooting outdoors, it becomes a simple venture of mostly base ISO work and the shutter speed that will stop motion. This is quite easy to setup, and this shared article will help you attain these rules.

But ‘High ISO’ is so good now

It really grinds my gears when I read this on photography forums. Do not ever take advice from people telling you that aperture doesn’t matter anymore because ‘high iso’ is so good now. They are speaking about higher iso’s being cleaner and more useable than over a decade ago. That is true, however it doesn’t change the fact that shot discipline and the right lenses will give noticeably better results. It doesn’t change that photography is light, and aperture is one of the corner stones of getting good quantities of light to the sensor. Don’t hamper yourself in low light by shooting with f/4 lenses. Don’t stop down f/1.4 prime lenses to f/5.6 in low light to get depth of field at the penalty of huge amounts of noise unless you are using flash or strobes. Use composition, light, subject and timing to make your photograph stand out. For my thoughts on noise, read my article on that here.

Equipment

Ideally we want a full frame camera such as the Nikon D810 (highly recommended). And a fast aperture prime lens, a 50mm f/1,4 is a good start. We want a full frame camera, because they collect more light as they have big sensors, and this brings greater noise performance along with the rest of it. We want a short to medium focal length (28-85mm) with a fast aperture. We don’t want a really long focal length, at least not yet. Hand holdable shutter speeds are easier with short lenses, more on this concept later. Equipment I recommend for these tasks…

  • 24mm f/1.4G / 24mm f/1.8G

  • 50mm f/1.4G / 50mm f/1.4D / 50mm f/1.8D / 50mm f/1.8G

  • 85mnm f/1.4D / 85mm f/1.8D / 85mm f/1.8G / 85mm f/1.4G

Any 35/1.4 is also a good choice.

Available Light

Shooting with available light is the first thing most people do when they obtain a fast aperture prime lens; and who could blame them? However, to get really good at this and for the pictures to make logical sense, we need to consider light a lot more than the average person does. Quantity, Quality, Direction. These three things are paramount. Sometimes we won’t be able to have all three, in fact, often we won’t. We might only have two, and a great subject. With the right timing, and a little bit of composition know-how we have ourselves a great picture. Read more about timing and composition in my previous article here.

Wedding Girl. Nion D700 with 24mm f/2.8D prime lens

Light Quality and Quantity / Direction

A very important topic is the quality, amount and direction of our light on our subject. Hard light sources tend to produce more focused beams of light, and hard shadows with fall off. Hard light sources generally come from smaller light sources, at distance to the subject and are usually less diffused (hence the name). Soft light, is generally generated by light that is diffused through a diffuser such as a fabric, a cloth, curtain, blind, umbrella (in posed shooting), a softbox (again posed shooting) etc. Some of the softest light we can get is the natural softbox effect of the middle of the day overcast cloud. Light becomes extremely soft and even, because the light from the sun is passing through an interface (cloud) before it strikes the Earth’s surface. Another easy given is window light, even better if have a thin blind / diffuser that can be placed over it for more control. Pop a subject there on an overcast day and try some compositions. Try them front lit, and fill their face and eyes with soft, even light. Then try them side lit. Get some shadows on one side of their face. Don’t be too rigid whilst learning. You don’t need to know the names of the light styles you are shooting, like Rembrandt. You just have to do what looks good at this stage. I highly recommend studying old paintings. ‘The Blue Boy’ for one. Look at the 18th Century Gainsborough paintings. Check out the feeling created in Constable’s paintings. Look at the world he creates from a picture. Watch the Stanley Kubrick film ‘Barry Lyndon’ for more inspiration. Look at the famous Renaissance Portraits. For me, I have always been fascinated by iconic paintings. Choose your inspiration, because everyone has a place that made them grow from.

Little Girl at Wedding. D800, 85mm f/1.4D Prime lens - Shot with window light on an overcast day

Quantity of light is something that available light shooters can do little with. We have to work with what we have at the scene. There are some ways however. Due to the inverse square law, light falls of extremely fast from a light source. So if you are shooting a subject by window light, or even candle light, move them closer to the light to gain more intensity. This also increases quality too, as the lightsource becomes effectively larger relative to the subject. When a light source get’s larger in this way, it always gets softer and we get better quality light on our subject as a result. Test this. Get your phone out and go into the bathroom with the torch on but the lights out. Put the torch on your face, ultra close to the side of your eye / cheek/ Notice how soft and beautiful the light appears? Now move it away, as far as possible from your face, at arms length. Notice how nasty the light just became? It’s beacuse it got effectively a lot smaller relative to your face. The light went from a soft light source, to a hard light source. This is why, when we see people shoot professional scenes, they use huge softboxes and umbrellas, and they are super close to the subject’s face being photographed, often just off camera and out of shot.

Direction of light is something that we can also control near windows to a degree. For example, by very simply pulling curtains together a little, we can leave them open in areas that create soft yet directional light. Outdoors we can have some control of the direction of light by observing the angle of the sun relative to our subject. We can position them, and shoot at a time of day that produces better light. We can also, mix available light with some flash if feeling adventurous. Trial placing the sun behind a subject to start. The try from the side, then from the front. At this point, form opinions about what looks best, and what works for your shooting style. Indoors, in lowered available light, the obvious direction of light comes from the arteficial lights themselves. The lamps, ceiling lights, and other lightsources that interact with our subject. We need to look at these and wait / position our subject near to them in an optimal way to achieve an interesting picture.

Portrait of a Boy. Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.4D Prime lens - Using window light as a rim light to create light and shadow

Settings

So how do we approach settings in available light, in particular low? Well, this comes from learning about the camera’s inbuilt light meter. All camera light meters measure the reflected light from a scene into our lens at in instant in time. This allows the photographer, (or in auto mode, the camera) to make a correct exposure of the scene. However, how do we actually do that? What are the actual mechanics at play? Let’s look at an example first.

Arcade Boy - Nikon D810 with 24mm f/1.4G lens

I watched my son for quite some time delicately placing his 10p coins into the slots in this arcade machine. I have the benefit that with Nikon cameras and their top screens, I can see what the meter is reading at all times. (tip: menu, and extend the meter off delay - this will allow you to decide exposure before you even bring the camera to your eye). With the D810 and my 24mm lens in lower light, I will often be in manual mode for pictures such as these. I will also be at the widest aperture to gather the most light. I will also be here to get the best separation as you can see here in the final shot. Next, I will be considering my shutter speed based on the movement at the scene and how sure I am of my abilities. I know that I can hand hold a 24mm lens down to 1/15 and get pixel level sharpness. However, there is no way that my son was that motionless. Therefore, I went up to 1/80 and waited until he was positioned correctly in the frame, and paused any eratic motion as to take the picture. The camera meter will have a central point on the display in camera of where it thinks is ideal exposure. This is where I look to the ISO to correctly expose the scene. We have so far, an aperture of f/1.4, and a shutter speed of 1/80. This defineds how much light we collect. ISO is a digital signal boost which brightens the scene to that it looks correct to our eyes and makes a good picture. In this particular case, light was so plentiful that base ISO 64 let the meter see ideal exposure with f/1.4, 1/80. In lower light, you will have to boost ISO to achieve a properly exposed image. If you can, opening aperture or lowering the shutter are the two parameters that actually increase the light collection the sensor will see. Remember that ISO is a digital boost within the camera after the fact. However, we do need to use ISO to do this, so that we don’t involke more noise, or colour casts from bringing up overly dark images at the scene in post processing. If you approach low light scenes like this and the camera lets you see ideal exposure with 1/80-1/100 shutter speed at base ISO, you just won a watch. If the meter tells you that you can have 1/50 shutter speed, but you need to be at ISO 1600, obviously you are in much lower light. You can either add light with flash, get closer, or open up the aperture of the lens wider. If you are at the maximum aperture, you can also drop the shutter, but then you have to contend with scene movement, and the steadiness of your own hands.

The Laughing Bride - Nikon D810, 85mm f/1.4D. Low light quantities, but decent quality and direction allow for a shot in available light.

We need to be careful of illogical settings when shooting in manual mode. Here are some for this scene:

ISO 1600, 1/8000, f/1.4.

These make absolutely zero sense. Why would I shoot at ISO 1600 when I have a shutter speed of 1/8000? Unless we are shooting greyhounds in a dark room moving at vast speed, we do not need such a high shutter speed. If the meter suggests this is a good exposure, then we can simply modify this to logical settings, thus ISO 64, 1/500, f/1.4. We just made our picture have much higher quality because we could use base ISO - where all the best quality exists. Now we can’t always do this. Let’s look at more illogical settings that I see all the time when people shoot in low light:

ISO 6400, 1/100, f/4

These settings make little sense to me. Why are we maxing out our ISO (where noise is going to be a problem, and colour is going to be poorer) when we are at f/4? If we are shooting with an f/2 or even better, and f/1.4 prime lens, we can drop this to something much more logical. We can be at ISO 800 if we have an f/1.4 lens! This would give the following: ISO 800, 1/100, f/1,4.

Remember, light collection is garnered via aperture and shutter speed. ISO is a digital gain applied after the fact, within the camera’s electronics and software. Photography is light. Let your sensor be bathed in it; do not starve it of light with less than optimal settings. However, also, do not get so caught up in settings that you miss a picture. Learn and understand exposure so intuitively that you do not even have to put much thought into it when shooting,..then you will be free to think about composition and timing.

Glow Stick Girl. Nikon D810, 50mm f/1.4G

Next let’s look at an image which is absolutely pushing the limits of available light shooting. ISO 12800, f/1.4 and 1/40 were my settings for this one. I knew that I could hand hold a 50mm lens to less than 1/40, however I had to think about the kid’s motion too, hence I settled on 1/40. Timed right, I’d get a sharp shot, as I have done here. ISO 12800 was easily decided on because the only light was the glow stick in the dark room. So I selected the maximum ISO of the D810. The aperture was another easy decision. We want that wide open in low light for something like this, so I had it set to f/1.4 from the get-go. To touch on what I said earlier; notice how soft the light is on her face here? It’s a tiny light source - the only thing lighting her is the light from this tiny glow stick. However, because it is close to her face, it becomes very soft.

In this sort of light, the meter is always going to tell me that I am badly underexposed. The light meter in my D810 is trying to effectively expose for 18% grey. Thus it sees this sort of scene as underexposed. In these conditions we simply must extract every photon of light that we can from the scene. That’s where full frame cameras like the Nikon D810 come in, with fast aperture prime lenses.

Technique

When we are shooting in lowered light, we want to try to wait until subjects have the least motion, and photograph them at that point. It becomes a watching and waiting game. I do this because, it allows me to use a much slower shutter speed, and get more light onto my camera sensor. There might be the odd time I mis-judge this and I have to delete a picture. So be it. Hand holding technique is another big ticket item in this game. We can practice how to properly hold our camera, how to lock our elbows and arms tight to our body to become like a human tripod. We can even on occasion, use walls to lean ourselves against, or infact the actual camera itself pushed against a wall for lateral stability. This can allow you to drop your shutter speed even more. Be careful though, you have to content with subject motion. This effect is magnified by the focal length of the lens and your distance to your subject. I can use much slower shutter speeds with a 24mm lens at slight distance, vs an 85mm lens close up. Any motion will be magnified of both the subject and your wobbly hands. Think of it like looking out of your window on a point in the far distance with high magnification binnoculars. It’s hard to hold them still and focus in the distance. The wobble is easily noticed by the eyes as we look though the lenses.

A very simple Passport Photo of my son by yours truly

Creating Light

I said I would touch on this topic before I wrapped up this article. It’s the subject so many photographers’ fear. Flash Photography. The subject that makes so many state themselves as ‘available light’ photographers. Do not be afraid of flash. Even if you use available light more than flash photography as I do; understanding how to use flash will allow you to understand light on a much deeper level and it will always elevate your photography.

This is a very simple shot, and bear in mind that it was made as a passport photo, hence my options of lighting are very limited - as are the expressions they want in these things! I can’t create a nice dramatic shadow on the right side of his face as I would like to (I am surprized I got away with this infact - I decided to push my luck a little and use shallow depth of field too, the guys are the passport office must have just glared over this for a couple of seconds). For this shot I used:

  • D810 on a tripod

  • 85mm f/1.4D prime

  • Lightstand with an off camera speedlight through a large white umbrella, camera right, very close to subject

  • Wireless trigger on camera

For nearly all flash photography we use manual mode on camera. We control the shutter speed, ISO and aperture. This means, for example when shooting a wedding in low light, that the background remains consistent, shot to shot. For this type of posed setup I am showing, I still use manual mode. f/2, ISO 64, 1/250 were my camera settings. These settings are easily explained - base ISO for overall quality, f/2 for some shallow depth of field, and 1/250 as that is the flash sync speed. This means that mostly all of the ambient light at the scene will be overruled by my flash going off, creating a nice even light. I set the flash to 1/4 power and in the very low light I was in, I autofocused on the eye using the AF-assist beam in the D810. I noticed it was a little hot on the skin, so I simply dropped back to 1/8 power on the speedlight. And that was it. In posed setups I always manual everything. At a wedding, I still favour mostly available light, however I am not afraid to bring out a flash when the light is diabolical everywhere I look. When in those situations, I switch the flash to TTL mode (through the lens) which means it calculates the power needed on demand. Most of the time it does a fairly good job of it too.

Closing Thoughts

I hope this gives a general overview of how I approach available light shooting. It is always about catching the esccence of the subject and using light to make an interesting picture. Sometimes we have more control than we realise. It is about harnessing that ability when shooting in true available light to make the light and the scene work for ourselves. Just remember, you aren’t shooting true reportage photography unless you are observing. As soon as you direct a subject, you are influencing the perception. You can make allowances though. Say you want to grab a perfect birthday candle shot of a loved one blowing out candles in a restaurant. Ask for a seat with a good background seperation. Get the subject to sit in a position that allows you direct access to shoot them, and allows a beautiful background fall off because you have given yourself space in the background behind your subject. This will give you a nice depth to work with. There are many examples of things you can do to stack your chances of getting a great picture, without coming across as overbearing By thinking this way, you give yourself more opportunities. Thanks for reading.

Steve

D810, 35mm f/1.4 Sigma Art Prime Lens

Lower Quadrant Framing Photography Compositional Technique

Introduction

For me, one of the most impressive uses of this technique in recent times is from a TV series. The beautifully crafted cinematography in Mr Robot shines a cut above most of what I see on TV and continually uses this technique to create and relieve tension between characters whilst building the story. One of the reasons I perhaps find it so effective is I find it easy to identify with which gives it a more powerful voice. Cinematographer Tod Campbell uses lower quadrant framing to create beautiful results that tell the story, shot to shot. Visual tension builds from the very first scene and continues to do so as we learn about Elliot. As my English teacher always told me: ‘show, don’t tell’ and that is exactly what this character study does. The series portrays the protagonists’ boldness, isolation, and loneliness perfectly, as he slowly identifies societies’ problem with greed and material possessions. This is in part to this technique of placing the characters in carefully thought out places within the frame in each and every scene we come to see them in. Everything about each scene is constructed beautifully, from the acting, sets, lighting and colour toning, to the composition and angles we observe the characters from.

Distracted by Television - 50mm f/1.4D

Not every picture needs to be a masterpiece. Some are merely a record of the scene. This was taken back in 2017 when I was first testing out this technique; admittedly probably never properly understanding it until more recent times. In this scene, the use of the technique in question explains that my son was completly lost watching a cartoon on the TV. He was almost completely unaware of my presence. There is a loss of balance in the frame, and a gaze that is opposite to the usual, expected convention of gazing into the negative space I created on the left of the picture.

Notice the soft, spherical aberration of the lens used wide open at f/1.4 which adds to the dreaminess of the scene and gives it a subtle glow look. I’ve spoken before about how I prefer lenses that produce this effect for portraiture, with the ability to reduce it by stopping down a stop or so. Read more on this here.

Rule of Thirds

Rule of Thirds

The Bride - Notice the two main subjects closely follow the rule of thirds, but not perfectly - 50mm f/1.4G

One of the most conventionally used techniques to frame shots, both cinematically, in artworks and paintings and also for photography; is the rule of thirds. The frame is divided up into nine pieces via intersecting lines. The subject is placed on one of the third intersection points - 1/3 or 2/3 of the way up or across the frame. This technique is simple in itself to use and it is seen absolutely everywhere. It is a good general rule to help with composition and balance, however it can be broken, or used in alternative ways as I have mentioned before. There is no pure magic to simply placing a subject onto a 1/3 intersection however. It’s not a magic compositional trick. As you can see above in my overlay, it is not something you should try to pin exactly on these points. As you may have seen in my Decisive Moment blog post, the frame boundaries and the objects around the edge frames can be important compositional anchors to either further direct the eye, or give the shot important context and we should consider this when framing the shot. You can see that in this particular composition I used a close to a rule of thirds frame, however not quite. I could have moved the camera up to place the lower left girl onto a third. I decided not to. She isn’t the main subject and if I did so, I’d loose some of the beautiful background context above the bride.

Lower Quadrant Framing

Quad framing grid Photography

Quadrant Framing - See below for the full size view

Quad framing, or lower quadrant framing as it is often known; feels like an uneasy version of the rule of thirds; however used creatively, it can have dramatic effect. The frame is split into four pieces this time. The placement of the subject in the lower corners of the frame, and the direction they are facing, along with the context of the background, directly influences the mood created. Quad framing is a play on positive and negative space within the frame. Another way to look at this part of composition over the more simplistic rule of thirds, is the relationship between the subject and the surrounding space. The subject is the “positive space”, while everything surrounding the subject is the “negative space.” If we increase the amount of negative space around a subject, we can increase the scene tension. It can almost feel like we are loosing the subject off the edges of the picture. This can in turn give a sense of oppression. That the subjects are small in the world they occupy and feel that way also. Their visual weight becomes smaller within the context of the frame. In photography and art, we are taught to create negative space and have the subject face gaze into that space - never must we have for example; my son in the picture at the beginning of those post above, be looking right out of frame, with the negative space on the left! However, that is exactly what we can do with this technique, to create an uneasiness, or a certain mood. It can create a disconnect between characters on screen. Or perhaps signify that they stand alone. By doing this, and perhaps even having the subject face in the direction opposite of the negative space in the frame, can construct a feeling of isolation or loneliness. It can also say something awkward about the scene; or that the subject feels under duress. Perhaps the scene does not depict something nice and rosey; that there is some kind of heavy metaphorical weight hanging over the subject. Or in some cases, as I have done below, it says more about the place the subject is present in. It is important to mention, you could apply this to the upper corners in certain scenes and ways, and you have the option of tilting the lens up slightly or down towards the subject to apply further creative effects. All in all, you can see why it is a technique used so often in the incredible Mr Robot TV series, which is ultimately about the crumbling of so called civilised society.

Coffee Shop, Ala Mr Robot - 35mm 1.4 Art

Lens Considerations

For this to work well, you want good control over the background. Because of this, I highly recommend a fast prime, 35mm or longer. Having a fast aperture, f/1.8 or larger helps with light gathering and control of the out of focus elements around our subject. When using extreme, off axis compositions it matters even more that the lens chosen has close to zero distortion. You will of course, be able to avoid perspective distortion easily by using a longer lens and not being too close. As mentioned, for full frame, I suggest the shortest focal length for this technique be around 35mm. 28mm may be possible if the lens has a very flat field and you aren't too close to the subject / they aren't human. A flat field 50mm prime works really well to get close. And obviously, portrait lenses like 85’s will be great here too. Get out of thinking that all distortion can be fixed in post. It sometimes just does not play out that way. Why not just select a lens with controlled distortion from the get go? I live with 35mm, 50mm and 85mm primes for this. Next, we want a relatively sharp lens off axis. I am happy as long as the subject isn’t blurry to my eyes on a 4K monitor. I will say that I am fond of the Kubrick picture Barry Lyndon, which uses super fast primes to shoot in candlelight. They aren’t the sharpest lenses on the planet, certainly by modern standards, but look at the candlelit scenes in this film and you will see why I love that look. I go by feel, not numbers or measurements of lenses. If you worry about flare, add that to the list of properties to look for. For me, I love flaring effects, so I actually look for lenses that add characer here. The 50mm f/1.4D Nikkor does this in spades. With the sun behind the subject, it will flare bright red and yellow / green areas if caught at the right angle. Another favourite is the 85mm f/1.4D Nikkor, a classic portrait lens with zero distortion. Not only does it give a beautiful rendering, if flares nicely and provides beautiful bokeh. I also do enjoy using a 35mm f/1.4 as I did in the above picture.

Upper Quadrant framing - 50mm f/1.4D

Upper Quadrant Framing

Often with pictures like the above of my son playing The Forest on my 32” 4K Asus Proart (that I mainly bought for editing, however it works beautifully for 4K 60 FPS gaming); I like to give huge volumes of negative, or background spacing. His head is firmly placed into the top left corner. Almost nothing is in focus here, as the depth of field is so shallow. I can also use the bright central area that f/1.4 glass gives to give a glow to the scene. This is a shot similar to what I described could be done earlier in this article; use the very top of the frame, and either stay level as I have here, or look downward to the subject - filling the remaining negative space effectively. This makes compositional sense here for several reasons; the shot is about him being transfixed to the game. The surroundings are therefore a dominant piece in the picture. Also, if I show more of him, I show less of what he is doing which would make little sense here. I could also have focused on the monitor, however at this aperture, he would have gone completely out of focus and I did not want that. I could have stopped down, however then I could not have shot at ISO 500 and kept all the dynamic range for the screen and shadow areas. Use aperture to your advantage at all times!

The next time you have a prime lens of about 35mm and upwards, spare a thought for lower quadrant framing (or indeed, upper quadrant framing) and see if you can break out of monotonous rule of thirds composition techniques.

Leave the Noise in your Photographs! (Techniques For Low Light Shooting)

Glowstick Girl. Absolutely pushing the limits of the D810 sesnor and fast aperture prime lens, the 50mm f/1.4G nikkor in ultra low light. ISO 12800, 1/40, f/1.4.

Introduction

Noise in images seems to create a huge panic amongst photographers these days, and I honestly do not know why this is. For a long time I have mostly preferred very low levels of noise reduction, or none at all in images I produce. I dislike the plasticy look that even advanced AI noise reduction programs achieve if pushed too far; and most of the time it just does not look natural to my eyes. I have some exceptions to this rule, for example in deep sky astrophotography work where I use it a little bit more due to the overall process involved; it almost feels more necessary, as it is normal practice to photograph extremely faint deep sky objects and stack many hours of images together to make the final image.

What I seem to see in forums and in discussions, is that this by product of producing a still image is so ugly that it must be removed, and in many cases, totally removed in that we get smudged, lifeless backgrounds of noiseless strata. I think that there are plenty of camera’s out there that produce a very organic, dare I say it, film like grain that doesn’t distract from the image, and at time’s that itself might even enhance it’s “realness” depending on the situation. We should remember most noise is hidden unless coasting 100% views of the image which no one does except us. The forerunning image in this article mostly captures my thoughts on noise. Leave it in. I’ll normally use it at a setting between 15-25, depending on the picture. This forerunning picture was set to 20, a reasonable setting for this extreme condition. Many would go much further with noise reduction. We would push it further, then the face becomes very plasticy looking, as do the PJ’s. We could take that even further, and mask out the face / body and just hit the background with NR; but then we get a real disconnect between the background and the subject. If I occasionally do this, I do it very gently so it is not picked up (like all good edits should be). This picture is a very extreme example. Most pictures do not require this level of touch up to obtain a great result. The advice I am going to impart in this article will keep your noise to an absolute maximum, allowing you to make great pictures even in ultra low light conditions with a little bit of know-how and practice.

Nikon D810, ISO 400 at f/1.4 and 1/125

Close up showing Noise (Pinch zoom if on mobile)

In this first example, I have used no noise reduction; because it simply isn’t warranted. Better to have details than smudges. Using good shot discipline, as I have done here, allows me to avoid any noise reduction in this case. You can see why I love shooting with the Nikon D810, despite still owning the newer mirrorless cameras. It’s sensor produces a very film like grain at moderate to high ISOs (400-6400 ish). There is no way I’d want to rid this from the image. Be aware, it is difficult to show the exact grain without doing a 100% crop - this isn’t one because it ends up being too small.

Settings

You will notice that in for example, Lightroom, (ie camera RAW in Photoshop) that there are some settings in the noise reduction panel to be aware of. There are sliders for the amount of total global noise reduction, and specific slides for luma noise, and colour noise with sliders to aid their application. For luma noise, I tend to use zero for most work, especially daylight landscapes. Even portraiture, I use very little or any, even if we are speaking about higher ISO portraiture in low light (of course with some directional light too hopefully).

I tend to ensure that colour noise is between 5-35 (this varies image to image); too high a level smudges any singular colour backgrounds together and leaves artefacts which are quite ugly in nature (that plasticy look again). They are very easy to spot in defocused backgrounds with fast lenses. Too low a setting and individual RGB pixels are seen which can really take away from the background of the image. Test this out for yourself and you will see what I mean. You’ll get better results than just leaving it at the default of 25 all the time.

Pinball Kid

In this example my son is playing his pinball machine and was too warm - deciding to go topless. An unusual, but humorous picture nonetheless, I always have a camera about in the house. This image was processed in Lightroom to reveal the massive dynamic range, and pull out the scene so it looks like what my eyes saw. When first assessing the RAW file, I could see very little into the shadows. The reason the file looks like this as it is presented in a linear looking form and has no curve or contrast adjustments applied to it yet. It was very simple to adjust the curve and shadows to bring out the D810’s beautiful dynamic range. Care must be taken to not just pull sliders about without reason, adding +100 to shadows will really bring out noise in situations like these and will worsen the image globally, reducing contrast and at times giving a horrible muddy, HDR look to the resulting picture. We don’t want that. What we want to do is produce a picture like what our eyes saw. Here are the majority of the settings applied to this RAW file, a relatively simple edit in this case:

The reason I have had to boost by +1.6 on exposure; is because I shot at the dual gain point of the D810’s sensor to maximise it’s dynamic range. The rest of the settings are self explainatory. Notice the slight upward curve point applied at the right of the leftmost hump. This increases midtone contrast and brightness. I have faded off the end of the blacks slightly to soften the image in the deepest tones, indicated by the applied leftmost point. I did a very basic singular mask on his face and highlights of his body and that was it.


Noise Reduction Settings

For this file, I left the settings at my default of 25 for colour NR. any lower, and bright R G B specs could be see in the darkest areas (like the vignette in the corners and the low lying exposure zones). Too high a setting, 35-55 for example, and the green background smudges into a horrible plastic one toned blob, we don’t want that, it’s not a good look. Yes I could clean further with the AI addition in LR, or elsewhere, but I left it in this time (it looks bad here bceause it is super magnified). You can see I haven’t applied any luminance here bccause in this particular example, doing so dropped the detail in the scene to levels I did not like. AI NR used sparingly, can work however as I will show later on in this article.

100% Crop


100% crop. NB focal plane on eyes outwith shot

This is the natural noise “grain” from the sensor, and I like to keep it real. If you have ever printed an image, you would know that noise just doesn’t really show up much. My advice to most shooters is to drop the time wasted on noise reduction and focus on something more worthwhile with the above simple caveats, and consider that yes, for deep sky astro work, things are a little different. Remember, that your mileage may vary. Whilst I feel that cleaning up too much of a file and making it too perfect destroys the realism, especially there are several factors that influence that - for example removing a rock in a landscape etc, you may not. Where does it stop? For every shooter, there will be a different place where they consider the edit has gone too far. As long as you are happy with your result and progess as an editor, you are on the right track.

NB - Please be aware that it is difficult to show you exactly what these files look like here. Image compression applied by the website tech can product some artefacting and blockiness can appear in deep blacks, not present in the end result on my monitor.

Extreme Low Light with the D810

Let’s look at an image that I made in November 2024 of my son in the back of the car on his tablet computer playing games. I shot this at too low of an ISO - 400. Despite the D810 being pretty invariant, I should have shot it up at 3200-6400 to get less amp glow and magenta cast on the right which I fixed in post. To my eye, this was much darker. All I could see was a tiny glow on his face, and the light from the tablet. The surroundings of the scene - the car door, and the window above with the glint of a car’s tail lights was barely made out by my vision, showing how incredible these cameras actually are for a fast shutter speed shot. This above image is the result of AI noise reduction in Lightroom. I used a setting of ‘25’ for it. This shot was boosted 4 stops in post! I can do this because as mentioned, the D810 is mostly invariant when doing so, however even if I shot at ISO 3200 etc, there is so little light that there would be very similar amounts of noise. This is when I will use moderate amounts of AI noise reduction, or sometimes a combination of Lightroom’s manual NR, and then AI NR.

Adobe AI Denoise

This is my preferred method of NR, being a Lightroom / Photoshop editor. It keeps this process in the family, and only takes a few seconds to do, and it also means I don’t have to waste money on other dedicated programs. However, for a while I kept getting blue / purple colour casts when using this powerful technique. I found out after some digging that it was nothing to do with graphics cards or out of date drivers in my case. I found out, that it needs to be applied first, or at the very least, before any masking is applied. You see, Denoise AI looks at the pure RAW data, and disregards any edits you have made to the raw file. It then calculates the setting you input, and then places those further edits you made, back over the file after it completes. If you have used complex masks and the like, it seems to be that the calculations get messed up and we sometimes experience strangeness such as the colour casts I was seeing. Since experimenting, I no longer have this problem. Sometimes it is useful to create a virtual copy of the file in lightroom. Do your edits on the initial RAW file, and see how much NR you will need. To the virtual copy undo all edits, then apply the NR, and simply sync the edits from the original RAW file over to it after it completes. This way, I never get casts and I will admit to it being a very powerful technique, when used with care.

Final Thought

Do not be like everyone else in this game who obsesses over noise in photographs. It’s the worst trait of photographers today. (Apart from those dudes that show up at dark sky sites when I have been there all night, lighting stuff up with torches!). Consider how much NR you need and apply it tastefully. I highly recommend Adobe Denoise AI in lowered amounts. Think about the scene. Let’s make it feel like film, and less like digital. For the most part, it’ll turn out whole lot better than the plasticy look I see everywhere now…

The Decisive Moment

Boy and Dog, Nikon D850 with Sigma 35mm 1.4

Composing the Moment

Sometimes, in fact often, making a good picture is about waiting. Life is a waiting game in so many respects. To achieve a picture that is cohesive and produces an emotive response, we need to wait until the scene comes together in order to let it pack it’s fullest punch, so to speak. This is true of most forms of photography, from landscape to portraiture.

The decisive moment is a matter therefore, of timing, vantage point and composition. These three are inextricably linked. The light can work for or against us in these situations where it is most likely something will happen. Let’s examine these three points. Timing is the first obvious one. We don’t want to capture subjects at weird angles, with eyes blinking, squinting faces, odd poses etc. Most people understand this basic conecpt about photography. Vantage point is especially important in most scenes. Sometimes you just need to be a little higher or a little lower to change a good picture into a great one. It’s all about seperation. If I had been lower to the ground here, I would have had the subject interfere with the background radiator, and I wouldn’t gain the lovely seperation we have here. I would have also put too much window into the shot, which would have weakened the shot by pulling the eye out of the scene to a very bright area. Composition is the final, very obvious point. We need to piece the scene together in a logical way that garners the most impact.

For the particular scene above, my son was playing his Nintendo Switch on the TV, and my parent’s little dog, Lottie, was sitting with him as she often did quite content. She was there for quite some time but compositionally, from where I was sitting especially, it did not work as a photograph. I spent a bit of time just watching, no camera, but sitting in the place that would form a nice composition if she moved into the correct place, and he held where we was. I ideally wanted the dog at the corner of the rug, which forms a nice solid arrow towards our subject, Lottie. This along with a placement residing more or less along a third line, balances out the strongly weighted left scene I had in front of me before she moved into that spot. Remember, we have to be flexible here. I can’t put them both perfectly on thirds and just think I am some compositional master. It doesn’t work like that. This is about balance; and I need to show the TV set that my son is looking towards also, in order to give the photograph proper context. I like that they are both looking outward of the frame on the upper left and lower right sides, this actually further balances the overall scene. The lifted paw in slight motion blur, and the slight space between the floor and the paw along with the shadow of the dog on the flooring gives it a dynamic feel. The chair on the right frames the right side, such that the TV does on the left, further balancing the scene that would have still been a little left - heavy without it. It also alludes that this is a living room, of course.

Some compositional basics

The Equipment

If you are using zooms to shoot scenes like these, you are missing out on some goodness. Zooms with f/2.8 apertures are obviously slow compared to fast primes in the f/1.2-1.4 range (x4 less light) and steal opportunities to make a more impactful shot without using flash, which would have absolutely startled and freaked out the little dog. I wouldn’t have been able to achieve the cinematic feel I have here with slow apertures either. I would loose the isolation, the vignette and some of the pop I am getting from this prime lens. You will notice in cinema, that the Director of Photography will pull focus between subjects when they are speaking etc. Often this just causes a subtle blur on the person not talking at the time. We have created this effect here, you can see my son is slightly out of focus, it drives the eye away from his large size in the frame towards the dog. The lens I used here is a Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art, teamed up with a Nikon D850, the best DSLR ever built, period. It goes without saying, I would have had no problem shooting this with a D800, or D810 body. In terms of focal length for this scene, 24mm would have been far too wide (subject size would diminish unless I got very close), and 50mm too tight to reveal the important compositional markers hidden about the room and the subjects.

The Settings

As per my usual shot discipline, I am at base ISO here, in order to maximise quality. Importantly, I knew I did not want to blow the window highlights, as this bright area would pull the eye away from our subjects. I used; ISO 64, 1/100 and an aperture of f/1.4. I exposed to the right of the histogram, without clipping anything to have the maximum processability of the resulting RAW file. I wanted to be at f/1.4 for two main reasons. This aperture on a fast 35mm prime at close range, nicely isolates subjects and gives a subtle fall off, which further directs the eye. The second reason is that the natural lens vignette is a useful tool; it is most present at f/1.4 (I have slightly enhanced it in processing). By shooting wide open, the vignette helps me calm down the window area within the histogram boundaries, and keep the shadows in a better place. If I shot at f/4, there would have been zero vignette, and I would have had to back off the histogram more to the left side, meaning noisier shadows, and worse quality overall. The shutter speed of 1/100 is sufficient at this distance to freeze a slow moving subject such as the dog, however allows the tiniest hint of motion at the leading paw which I like (I could have gotten more of this by stopping the aperture down a shade, but it is at the risk of the dog becoming overall, too motion blurred and ruining the shot).

The Processing

Good processing should be unseen for the most part; in the sense that it is subtle and the edits cannot be physically noticed. The processing should bolster the story of the scene and further direct the eye. Everyone has their edit style, and most people have a constantly evolving style that only gets better through experience. I know mine has improved vastly, even just these last few years.

The next time you are shooting anything, just think where the scene elements will be the most impactful. Balance everything up, work with the light and process in order to further direct the eye and the story you are trying to tell.